What Looks Like Privilege on an Ordinary Day


What I’m about to write isn’t a criticism of Senator Sanders, although some of his more ardent defenders may take it that way.  What I am about to write is an examination of privilege and how it works, often invisibly, to give men advantages over women.  If we don’t at least start to see privilege at work, we’re going to have a difficult time addressing it, which, I realize, is often exactly what the privileged want us to have.

When Secretary Clinton ran for the Democratic nomination in 2008, there was this thing that kept happening on blogs and in the media that bothered me, but I couldn’t quite put my finger on just what was wrong.  And, knowing as I did that I was strongly biased in her favor, I was reluctant to respond, in case my discomfort were actually with Secretary Clinton.  What would happen is that either the candidate herself or, often, someone who supported her would make some statement that, especially taken out of context, could be interpreted to be racist.  And she would get criticized, not just for the statement, but for running a poor campaign.  What was wrong with her?!?!?  Why was she listening to such shitty advisors?!?!?  If she couldn’t run a better campaign, how could she run the country?!?!?!  The phenemon got worse as the campaign wore on, as it became increasingly clear that she was probably going to lose the nomination, and as people whom, I believe, were looking for reasons to dislike her, seized upon what were actually pretty silly incidents.

It happened when Ms. Ferraro said that then-Senator Obama was doing as well as he was because he was a black man.  It happened when Ms. Clinton said she was not going to drop out before the end of the race because we never know what could happen and it was taken as a veiled desire to see Senator Obama shot.  It happened just again, recently, when, in response to a question about why Secretary Clinton doesn’t attract more young women, Gloria Steinem inartfully explained that women often become more radical feminists as they age.  (For some reason, I’ve never heard anyone ask Senator Sanders or his supporters why he can’t manage to attract more old men.)

Well, fair enough.  Running for president ain’t, as the saying goes, beanbag and if you screw up, you’re going to get called on it.  Except that it doesn’t always work that way.  I’ve been noticing over the last week or so that Senator Sanders and some of the people supporting him are now making some of the same kinds of statements that would have merited a week of yelling if Secretary Clinton had said them.  And the response has been basically:  crickets.

Here are a few examples of what I’m talking about:  After his loss in South Carolina, due, at least in large part, to his inability to win African American votes, Senator Sanders addressed an overwhelmingly white crowd in a different state and told them that they were “too smart” not to vote for him.  Now, I have absolutely no doubt that Senator Sanders wasn’t trying to insult African American voters.  But it’s the kind of misstep that would have brought the ceiling down on Secretary Clinton’s head.  Yet, it barely merited a few snarky tweets.  Similarly, the other day, a rapper named TI endorsed Senator Sanders.  He said:  “Not to be sexist but, I can’t vote for the leader of the free world to be a woman.  Just because, every other position that exists, I think a woman could do well.  But the president?  It’s kinda like, I just know that women make rash decisions emotionally — they make very permanent, cemented decisions — and then later, it’s kind of like it didn’t happen, or they didn’t mean for it to happen.  And I sure would hate to just set off a nuke.  [Other leaders] will not be able to negotiate the right kinds of foreign policy; the world ain’t ready yet.  I think you might be able to get the Loch Ness Monster elected before you could get [a woman elected].” And, again, the response was:  crickets.  Last night, after Super Tuesday losses due, in large part, to African American voters choosing Secretary Clinton, the Sanders campaign announced that it will focus on getting its message out in white states where it is better received.  Crickets.

So I’m not criticizing Senator Sanders, nor am I justifying Secretary Clinton.  What I am doing is pointing out that we have different standards and that women and men get treated differently.  Every single misstep the woman makes results in boatloads of criticism.  But we make excuses for the man, shrug stuff off, focus more on real issues than out-of-context slips of the tongue.

And that, mes amis, is privilege.


7 responses to “What Looks Like Privilege on an Ordinary Day

  1. Absolutely! T.I. quote really pissed me of yesterday when I read it… Lochness monster? Really??

  2. Jane Gagle-Bennett


  3. daisyarnold39

    I’m watching from afar and I am shocked by the amount of criticism that HC gets but which would not be aimed at men – “too loud”, “too much of a tough ass”, “too strident”. Surely these are good things to have in a President and no one would want a mealy mouthed, whispering wimp leading their country?

  4. I agree that she gets reactions which are based solely on her gender. Regarding race specifically, though, it seems to me less about her being a woman and more about her ties to the South. That appears to be what is turning off the Pagans of color who aren’t too keen on seeing her elected, so far as I can tell.

  5. Terrance, I’m not sure what you mean? That you know Pagans of Color who are unhappy that Southern African Americans support Clinton? I would agree that her African Americans support is less based on her being a woman than on other factors.

  6. I’m hearing you. AND almost every piece I’ve read about Hilary is talking about what a shoe-in she is for the nomination. Sanders name is barely mentioned. This is in the news reports I read. Hearing you and Hilary has a privilege that comes from her many years of playing-the-game: the party is behind her. And that backing may well make all the difference in the world.

  7. Given that Sanders wasn’t a party member until 2015, that the party is behind Hillary isn’t surprising. This is not “privilege.” Hillary has put in the work for the party for years.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s