Full Circle, as Demonstrated by Susan the Snowflake Collins

Supreme Court Nominee Brett Kavanaugh Meets With Democratic Senators On Capitol HIll

The notion behind our democracy was that if people could vote, we’d have representatives who were doing what the majority of the people wanted them to do. If someone wasn’t doing that, then the answer was for the majority of people to vote them out of office and install someone more to their liking.  Citizens United (and, no, I haven’t forgotten that the suit against campaign finance laws was originally titled Citizens United Not Timid — an anti-Hillary group) changed that.

Because the US doesn’t fund election campaigns, politicians have to raise money to afford ads, staff, mailers, canvassers, etc.  And political action committees (PACs) and rich people such as the Koch brothers can provide more of that money in one fell swoop than a politician can raise in months of appeals to small donors (you and me).  PACs and other “dark money” groups (groups that don’t have to reveal where they got their money) can then demand whatever favors they want — tax cuts, cuts to the regulatory protections to our air, water, food, consumer services, etc.  These groups can also stop politicians from doing things the groups don’t like.  “Gee, if you don’t vote the way we want, we’ll not only not fund (aka bribe) you, we’ll fund a primary challenger to you in your next election.  We’ll run negative attack ads against you.  That’s scary to incumbents because, first, the challenger might win and, second, even if the incumbent wins, they’ll have had to spend money, effort, political capital, etc. before the actual election even starts.  And, so, without ever actually spending a dime, these groups can threaten their way to whatever goodies they want.

Senator Sheldon Whitehouse writes about this in his excellent book,  Captured:  The Corporate Infiltration of American Democracy.

Citizens United did not add to America’s policy debate; it gave big special interests a weapon to suppress debate, with political threats and bullying they did not have the power to use before.  . . . .

Before [Citizens United] a corporate CEO could threaten to host a fund-raiser for your opponent, he could put his support for your opponent in the employee newsletter, or he could send your opponent a $10,000 PAC check, and that was about it.  And he’d have to do it all publicly.  It was a crime, for instance, for the CEO to launder a donation through an employee, friend, or family member to boost his giving clout or hide his role.  Now, the corporate CEO (or more likely his political operatives, as he probably doesn’t want to get his hands too dirty with the new “wet work” of politics) simply has to approve a dollar number and unleash the new apparatus.  Since corporations regularly seek benefits in Washington worth many billions of dollars for their industry, the natural limit on the dollar amount number [that] it makes sense for the CEO to unleash is very high.

The result has been representatives who care far less about what their constituents want than about what the big money donors want — and don’t want.

Susan Collins is a good example.  Her constituents don’t want to see Roe v. Wade overturned.  For years, Senator Collins has played a stupid game in which she gets the SCOTUS nominee to make vague promises about respecting precedent, she votes for them, they go to the Court and overturn precedent and she acts surprised.  It’s pretty clear that she’s made a commitment to approve Judge Kavanaugh despite the fact that everyone knows he plans to overturn Roe v. Wade and then go for birth control and the right to privacy.  (It’s likely her big money donors want Judge Kavanaugh more for his pro-corporate stance than for his abortion aversion, but it hardly matters.  The result is the same; they call the tune and Senator Collins dances.)

Senator Collins understands how the game works; she not only receives a ton of money from big donors who want favors from her,   she’s married to a wealthy lobbyist CEO .    A lobbyist is a person who buys votes from representatives on behalf of large corporations, other countries, rich people.

Now, a group of citizens  have gotten together online and — in a GoFundMe-type action — have raised money for a potential challenger to Senator Collins if she votes to approve Judge Kavanaugh.  She’s outraged and the media is playing along with her.  She gave an interview to a right-wing media outlet and complained that the money was a  bribe.  NBC reported on it, calling the challenge questionable fundraising.

We’ve come full circle.  When citizens try to elect people who actually represent them, that’s “bribery” and it’s “questionable,” but when huge corporations and big lobbyists buy representatives with money and financial threats, that’s totally OK.

There’s a short-term solution to this and a longer-term solution.  The short-term is to continue to raise money and to use it to vote out politicians who ignore the will of the majority of their constituents.  Longer-term, we need to undo Citizens United.  Oh, and shame on Senator Collins.  People of Maine:  do better.

Picture found here.

3 responses to “Full Circle, as Demonstrated by Susan the Snowflake Collins

  1. A succinct and well written explanation of why I dislike Citizen’s United and REALLY want to see it repealed. Also of why it may never be. (Grrrr)

  2. Susan Collins wants to have it both ways, she was just as invested in Mitch McConnell’s vague promises about a healthcare vote/compromise which enabled her to vote along party lines but continue to lie to her constituents about her “concern”.

  3. Thank you for telling me about the crowdfunding campaign to fund an opponent of Sen. Susan Collins if she does vote for Kavanaugh. I sent in some money. The fund is now up to $1.5 million.
    (Sen. Collins has around $1.3 million in her reelection fund right now—although she did spend about $5 million to get elected in 2016.)
    But really, saying that if citizens contribute money, that counts as a bribe, and when corporations and PACs give money to candidates that is democracy—well that is some truly mixed up rationalization.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s